Sam Hartman
2005-12-10 22:13:12 UTC
Hi. I believe this review is on track and the
intent of the WG was probably to allow kink_encrypt to be used in these situations.
Can people confirm that's the case?
If so, does someone want to suggest a small set of textual changes
that accomplish this? Please propose changes in rfc-editor note
format (rfcdiff --ab-dif) so we don't need to respin the draft.
--Sam
intent of the WG was probably to allow kink_encrypt to be used in these situations.
Can people confirm that's the case?
If so, does someone want to suggest a small set of textual changes
that accomplish this? Please propose changes in rfc-editor note
format (rfcdiff --ab-dif) so we don't need to respin the draft.
--Sam